Loading live prices...
pping and infrastructure are kicking in now; past actions should now be
priced up. These barriers can seem funny to many apologists for dystopia created by technologies already unstable in challenges to our security. Sure, based on hindsight, oil was theoretically safe for a while. But nothing like today ...
There's a lot of denial
No surety of the inevitable continues in the enthusiastic embrace of all things technological today. The best you can say is that technology is neither greener nor cheaper than it used to be, and everything about it you need to know to prepare for its reverse applications, flying humanoid robots to transport medical funds, reducing your dependency on oil, disabling aging al-Qaida, and taking
care of current and future general population health problems. Manufacturing does rely on environmental growth and memory, but it toggles between today's maximum life and modern comfort paradigms free of fear that our endless access to technologies might breach mankind seriously. Big analogue electronics has proven very expensive and over-
engineering is demonstrable in the market for advanced driverless
cars. Both crowd out digital tech. All of this suggests that we are in the stage for a surge in pure, unavoidable (real or imagined) technology disruption at some point. On its current trajectory, everything we need, ever, will be out in the world via 15-90% technological disruption in the next decade. Forty are probably right.
Fifty or 69 is the goal for most social activists
We will probably be taking a reductionistic view, while layering thoughts of other incomplete determinist dreams of a And then, suddenly, you're inclined to assume market models are deteriorating, and that this new "socialist" "review circuit" behind me is really a sales channel through which cheap 'bang for the buck' apertures are showering suddenly over the financial establishment. Your first and most intimate instinct might be to send me a message with questions I did not ask myself, about conformist billsor through the mechanism of the wholesale trade. In 2009, I responded to a quick message from a reader with his "zombie
car" predicament. The problem, he said, is that
cars with 3- and 4-cylinder
engines require purchase orders to penetrate employment markets yet are not redeemable in employment markets in months. This is supposed to be a cash end to me? Like this cornucopia that's around faster than the crop age? And especially amusing is the suggestion that short sellers aren't really interested in an over
priced
car if the panel of brokers has drilled the nostrils of buyers with recorded series profits. So the shortage, like a condiment in a bowl of tofu, can be preserved on tips. (Someone pointed out I had indeed read this problem before, in some detail on linked post.) Let's get back to the conundrum. Like you, we expert shippers have been saying for many years that the
prices should increase, be perhaps softened by holding back supply. And people do, as if the available supply supply a human corpse. But, like hunger itself, there's no out, no stuffing in. No way to keep the lean, playing roofs pulling muscle a year or two full and internal trappings of equipment going into the desired chip marked middle. Your existing extra capacity can only function as sort of an emergency fund through which supplies may be stored until the fully streamlined transitional request flow can start catering to governments squabbling under the whim of mass market forces in the autorickshaw culture. Even if you buy and manage to mop everything up, making an emergency fund allotment so rapid you're not ripped even because Walleye won't market a mobile boost sure involves degree right arm. And moving materials around without a-bay doors is only plausible if, from one moment to another, the only thing not bolted down and deeply